Say the word stem cell research in a group of one hundred people, and you will likely get one hundred different opinions on the subject. This is due to the fact that stem cells are varied and the controversy surrounding their use have roots in religious and moral objections, which view the potential damage to human life in collecting stem cells from embryos and amniotic fluid. However, since there is an increasingly blurry line between religion and politics, the two side have come into conflict and thus there is a confusion as to why stem cell research can be so passionately opposed by so many.
First of all to understand what stem cells are, I have included a short overview here. Now that you have read and understand a little about stem cells, let's talk about the ethical considerations.
![]() |
Stem Cells |
Unfortunately, in order to extract stem cells from the embryo, scientists must destroy the egg which some people believe also destroys human life. This moral argument is a complicated issue as it relies on ones own personal religious beliefs, as well as personal ethical considerations. As of today, there are no approved treatments which use embryonic stem cells, and some countries have passed moratoriums on their use in totality.
However, stem cells can be collected from other hosts, for example adult humans can have stem cells harvested from their bone marrow. Unfortunately, these adult stem cells are not nearly as useful as embryonic stem cells as they are not considered pluripotent, meaning they cannot be adjusted for use in treating ailments.
![]() |
HPCs Effective Treatment Range |
What, then, could possibly be causing such an uproar?
No comments:
Post a Comment